(29-06-2015, 17:00)Werk_AG Wrote: (22-06-2015, 19:11)JT118 Wrote: I have one of these which I intend to hook up to the weatherduino.
http://texaselectronics.com/products/rai...ucket.html
Currently, my efforts in the development of the WeatherDuino Pro 2 software goes in the direction of adding support to as many as possible weather instruments.
Following adding support for the Inspeed wind instruments, the next step will be adding support to virtually any tipping bucket rain gauge, which generates a click per tip.
There is already some work in progress. For the user, it will be just a question of define the collector type in terms of the correspondent mm per tip, and do an adjustment in the Cumulus multiplier.
I may need some help in this task, especially with feedback from those who want to volunteer to actively test a beta software version.
I am prepared to help if I can, I do teach engineering irrigation and a bit of hydrology so am not too bad at water volumes etc, and have reasonable grasp of rain gauge arithmetic. Incidentally I got my FO rain gauge from Maplins today. A quick measurement shows it is 54.80cm2. (dimensions 50mm x 110mm, less a little for the rounded corners.)I suspect they do their maths on the assumption of a 55cm2 collector. This means that 10mm of rain would be 55ml of water. For calibration purposes one normally uses 20mm of rain equivalent dripped into the gauge over 1 hour, therefore use 110 ml of water to calibrate.
If FO are assuming 0.3mm is represented by one tip, 110ml should tip the bucket 67 times. I will be surprised if it does; given the very ordinary build quality and the very vague bucket mechanism.
I have a Davis 7852
tipping bucket on my station (
www.ayrshireweather.org ) and will connect a Texas Instruments TR-525 to the Weatherduino once I have finished building it. (nearly there!)
The international standard for tipping buckets is 0.2mm per tip and most higher quality gauges use this as their standard; and a 154mm ( 6" ) diameter collector, research grade are often bigger. They have a sharp edge on the collector to ensure a definite cutoff and that any rain falling even slightly outside 6" diam falls out of the collector and not into it. One cannot accuse the FO gauge of having a "sharp" edge to the collector. It is very vague. For the money (£4.99) it is OK; but I suspect that you would have to assume a potential 20% error on this gauge from the actual rainfall.
I shall do some calibration exercises this week and see if it gets near to what I think is its specification. ie 55cm2 and 0.3mm per tip. Of course any inaccuracies in accuracy will be compounded by its lack of precision ie no sharp edge; splash out etc.