Hi,
The first two links appear to be for different stations and might not even be 434 MHz (Wi-Fi uses 2.4 GHz) or from the same manufacturer. IMHO, the "Solar Charging" in previous (2-cell) FO transmitters was basically useless, because the (necessary) 1.5 volts "Rechargeable Alkaline" is a rubbish cell technology. Worth checking if these newer 3-cell transmitters can use NiMH rechargeables.
It's much easier to "hack" a Wireless Protocol if you know the exact data (numbers) which are being transmitted. So having the matching Console could be of great benefit, but adds considerably to the cost. However, if these stations follow previous FO designs, the data will be pure binary (not BCD) with a CRC (not checksum) at the end.
Cheers, Alan.
The first two links appear to be for different stations and might not even be 434 MHz (Wi-Fi uses 2.4 GHz) or from the same manufacturer. IMHO, the "Solar Charging" in previous (2-cell) FO transmitters was basically useless, because the (necessary) 1.5 volts "Rechargeable Alkaline" is a rubbish cell technology. Worth checking if these newer 3-cell transmitters can use NiMH rechargeables.
It's much easier to "hack" a Wireless Protocol if you know the exact data (numbers) which are being transmitted. So having the matching Console could be of great benefit, but adds considerably to the cost. However, if these stations follow previous FO designs, the data will be pure binary (not BCD) with a CRC (not checksum) at the end.
Cheers, Alan.