16-08-2017, 20:45
Good evening,
My detector AQI was made by a French friend electronics engineer which lives in China.
The PCB is a derivative of a PCB which made for solar cam 100% autonomous.
That which is at home: http://www.solarcamlab.com/webcam70/webcam70.htm
Laurent a very great control of the energy management.
I made a test of autonomy on my cam without solar energy (only on its battery) at the end of one month I still had autonomy!
One has needs also an autonomous repeater solar WIFI 100%, it arrives in test at home in September (with the Chinese clouds…)
(for my station Blitzortung)
![[Image: img_2010.jpg]](https://i11.servimg.com/u/f11/18/78/82/62/img_2010.jpg)
It made other things design/fun.
It is not the subject which worry us, but it is simply for you show that Laurent is not a handyman of Sunday.
All that Laurent does passes by the management of solar energy/battery, but lack sometimes of a rigorous approach of measurements and their exploitations.
It is what I try to bring to him according to my weak competences. .
Version 1 is at his place in China, but it does not respect standards AQI completely.
https://thingspeak.com/channels/49795
It made for me a version 2 (not “clean” prototype) respecting standards AQI, the PCB is derived from its cam,
the sensor is Sharp GP2Y1010AU.
![[Image: img_0010.jpg]](https://i11.servimg.com/u/f11/18/78/82/62/img_0010.jpg)
https://thingspeak.com/channels/182605
In appendix characteristics of the SHARP.
In 2016, in fact the SHARP was more the energy saver (always the goal energy of Laurent) reason of the choice of the SHARP.
My detector set out again at Laurent, one reflected to replace the SHARP by another.
I prefer to keep the SHARP which has autonomy of use definitely larger than the PMS (less than 3 years!
laser!!!).
According to Laurent Plantower is not the originator (for the sensor part) of the PMS.
When I will recover my detector, I will work on his “mechanical” assembly
(in this field I am not likely to make stupidities) with a shelter Davis 7714.
That will allow better a natural ventilation as well as a clean and functional assembly.
The code is made by Laurent, as he says it is hard, but that goes.
I do not touch there - > one will see after the adventure of the RX/TX.
Unfortunately Laurent is far from available, therefore the evolutions are slow.
I hope that you understood me and seized the goal of my approach: to compare to evolve.
Good evening with all.
PS: "Oufti" like one says in Belgium, maintaining a good beer Belgian and good Belgian chocolate
My detector AQI was made by a French friend electronics engineer which lives in China.
The PCB is a derivative of a PCB which made for solar cam 100% autonomous.
That which is at home: http://www.solarcamlab.com/webcam70/webcam70.htm
Laurent a very great control of the energy management.
I made a test of autonomy on my cam without solar energy (only on its battery) at the end of one month I still had autonomy!
One has needs also an autonomous repeater solar WIFI 100%, it arrives in test at home in September (with the Chinese clouds…)
(for my station Blitzortung)
It made other things design/fun.
It is not the subject which worry us, but it is simply for you show that Laurent is not a handyman of Sunday.
All that Laurent does passes by the management of solar energy/battery, but lack sometimes of a rigorous approach of measurements and their exploitations.
It is what I try to bring to him according to my weak competences. .
Version 1 is at his place in China, but it does not respect standards AQI completely.
https://thingspeak.com/channels/49795
It made for me a version 2 (not “clean” prototype) respecting standards AQI, the PCB is derived from its cam,
the sensor is Sharp GP2Y1010AU.
https://thingspeak.com/channels/182605
In appendix characteristics of the SHARP.
In 2016, in fact the SHARP was more the energy saver (always the goal energy of Laurent) reason of the choice of the SHARP.
My detector set out again at Laurent, one reflected to replace the SHARP by another.
I prefer to keep the SHARP which has autonomy of use definitely larger than the PMS (less than 3 years!
laser!!!). According to Laurent Plantower is not the originator (for the sensor part) of the PMS.
When I will recover my detector, I will work on his “mechanical” assembly
(in this field I am not likely to make stupidities) with a shelter Davis 7714.
That will allow better a natural ventilation as well as a clean and functional assembly.
The code is made by Laurent, as he says it is hard, but that goes.
I do not touch there - > one will see after the adventure of the RX/TX.
Unfortunately Laurent is far from available, therefore the evolutions are slow.
I hope that you understood me and seized the goal of my approach: to compare to evolve.
Good evening with all.
PS: "Oufti" like one says in Belgium, maintaining a good beer Belgian and good Belgian chocolate