Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Nano 2.3 vs 3.0
#4

(07-01-2017, 19:47)Werk_AG Wrote:  The Nano should be the 368 - 16Mhz version.

I think you mean 328? I can't seem to find any reference to 368 processors. 

(Also, isn't the 168 also a 16MHz device, but with half the memory...)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by roddyp - 07-01-2017, 12:39
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by roddyp - 07-01-2017, 19:08
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by werk_ag - 07-01-2017, 19:47
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by roddyp - 07-01-2017, 20:07
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by werk_ag - 07-01-2017, 20:16
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by werk_ag - 07-01-2017, 20:12
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by Barrow4491 - 08-01-2017, 01:13
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by JT118 - 08-01-2017, 10:02
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by roddyp - 08-01-2017, 11:47



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)