Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Nano 2.3 vs 3.0
#3

Hi,

The Nano should be the 368 - 16Mhz version.

[edited]
The Nano should be the 328 - 16Mhz version (368 doesn't exist).
The 168 version only have 1K of SRAM which is very short to use even with the TX software.

Reply


Messages In This Thread
Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by roddyp - 07-01-2017, 12:39
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by roddyp - 07-01-2017, 19:08
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by werk_ag - 07-01-2017, 19:47
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by roddyp - 07-01-2017, 20:07
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by werk_ag - 07-01-2017, 20:16
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by werk_ag - 07-01-2017, 20:12
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by Barrow4491 - 08-01-2017, 01:13
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by JT118 - 08-01-2017, 10:02
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by roddyp - 08-01-2017, 11:47



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)