Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Nano 2.3 vs 3.0
#2

So it seems the main difference between 168 and 328 is that 328 has twice the memory. The TX board code with minimal options enabled seems to compile and run when configured for a 168, but I suspect that if I add more options and debug code I'll be out of RAM.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by roddyp - 07-01-2017, 12:39
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by roddyp - 07-01-2017, 19:08
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by werk_ag - 07-01-2017, 19:47
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by roddyp - 07-01-2017, 20:07
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by werk_ag - 07-01-2017, 20:16
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by werk_ag - 07-01-2017, 20:12
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by Barrow4491 - 08-01-2017, 01:13
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by JT118 - 08-01-2017, 10:02
RE: Nano 2.3 vs 3.0 - by roddyp - 08-01-2017, 11:47



Users browsing this thread: