Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Fine Offset - Cheapest Good Enough Sensors?
#4
Photo 

Thanks for the advice.

@JT118. Conflicting views made it difficult to gain an understanding from the the thread you referred to but I came across a "15 Jan 2014 Rain Sensors Compared" post in the "Notes about the process" section in the page http://lancet.mit.edu/mwall/projects/weather/ where they compared FineOffset WS2080, LaCrosse WS2317, and Meade TE923W during rain events and found "The WS2080 regularly under-reports rainfall." Looking at their plots it seems the other 2 substantially disagreed a lot of the time too. I couldn't see an obvious pattern in the differences.
[Image: weewx-rain-comparison-1.png]
[Image: weewx-rain-comparison-2.png]
[Image: weewx-rain-comparison-3.png]
@AllyCat. Thanks for pointing out the absence of Solar Power/Data. I'd missed that but was aware of the absence of a PC interface. I'm not in a hurry to get data uploading, more interested in the technology and there is other stations nearby for data in the meantime.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Fine Offset - Cheapest Good Enough Sensors? - by ken66 - 05-02-2016, 04:33
RE: Fine Offset - Cheapest Good Enough Sensors? - by JT118 - 05-02-2016, 08:00
RE: Fine Offset - Cheapest Good Enough Sensors? - by AllyCat - 05-02-2016, 11:10
RE: Fine Offset - Cheapest Good Enough Sensors? - by ken66 - 17-02-2016, 00:44
RE: Fine Offset - Cheapest Good Enough Sensors? - by JT118 - 17-02-2016, 22:19
RE: Fine Offset - Cheapest Good Enough Sensors? - by ken66 - 18-02-2016, 01:20
RE: Fine Offset - Cheapest Good Enough Sensors? - by JT118 - 18-02-2016, 23:12



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)