That's perhaps a tidy bit oversensitive.
-> This was not intended as "negative" feedback in any sort of fashion. Just supplying a few topics to steer the waters and animate discussion.
-> If indeed it makes sense (perhaps it does not, that is why I asked for criticism) and or it fits the existing frame is something I leave for your better knowledge [hence the added “(?)”]
-> I am honestly happy with what is to be offered, in fact I was not the one raising the issue of temperature and it has been shown that other systems do not take it in consideration as most of the time it has a very minor effect.
-> It can be easily argued that what is suggested makes little sense as it would introduce a lot of complexity to harvest just minor benefits (who knows, perhaps a 1-2% accuracy increase?)
Take it just as a "good pupil trying to show some commitment and progress"
-> This was not intended as "negative" feedback in any sort of fashion. Just supplying a few topics to steer the waters and animate discussion.
-> If indeed it makes sense (perhaps it does not, that is why I asked for criticism) and or it fits the existing frame is something I leave for your better knowledge [hence the added “(?)”]
-> I am honestly happy with what is to be offered, in fact I was not the one raising the issue of temperature and it has been shown that other systems do not take it in consideration as most of the time it has a very minor effect.
-> It can be easily argued that what is suggested makes little sense as it would introduce a lot of complexity to harvest just minor benefits (who knows, perhaps a 1-2% accuracy increase?)
Take it just as a "good pupil trying to show some commitment and progress"